Yes, it’s irrational. And it’s what the GOP says it wants
for our country, to save us from becoming “like Europe.” It’s also what the
post-New Deal Democratic Party stands for, only a little less.
Let’s start
with two recent events that highlight the damage American capitalism has done
to American political institutions. I’m talking about the appearances of Jamie
Dimon before the Senate Banking Committee on June 13 and the House Financial
Services Committee on June 19.
Dimon is chairman and CEO of
JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the U.S., with assets over $2 trillion. He
is a familiar figure on TV, with his elegantly coiffed white hair and serene
demeanor. He is widely and lavishly praised (even by President Obama) for his
financial wisdom.
Dimon had been summoned to explain his
bank’s recent loss of $2-3 billion dollars in risky trades at its London
branch. (Current estimates of the loss range from $6-9 billion.) People worried
that JPMorgan Chase was once again engaged in the same reckless gambling that
caused the global financial crisis of 2008. The FBI, the FED and the SEC are also
investigating.
All these investigations should
remind us that the weak Dodd-Frank reform law of 2010 has left JPMorgan Chase
and other Wall Street giants too big to fail (TBTF). The financial world knows
that the U.S. government will bail them out if they go broke just as it did in
2008.
Their TBTF status raises their
credit rating and lowers their borrowing costs. In the case of JPMorgan Chase,
this amounts to a $14 billion government subsidy according to an article in Bloomberg.com
(“Dear
Mr. Dimon, Is Your Bank Getting Corporate Welfare?”).
Republican senators on the Banking
Committee received Dimon with a fawning frenzy. For instance, Sen. Bob Corker
(R-Tenn.) asked Dimon “What would you do to make our system safer?” And Sen.
Mike Crapo (R-Ida.) asked “What should the function of regulators be?” Sen. Jim
DeMint (R-South Carolina) solicited Dimon’s “ideas on what you think we need to
do.” It was like a delegation of hens imploring the fox for his recipe.
JPMorgan Chase, described by
President Obama as “one of the best managed banks,” is a habitual criminal. Try
googling “JPMorgan
Chase crimes.” I stopped counting after finding a total of $6 billion in
settlements for various kinds of bid-rigging, bribery and fraud. In a decent,
law-abiding country that values accountability, Dimon’s corrupt firm would have
been shut down.
The Senate committee was roundly
criticized for its obsequious behavior. Perhaps as a result, when Dimon went
before before the House Financial Services Committee six days later, several
members of both parties asked critical questions.
However, as The Nation’s George
Zornick reported,
committee chairman Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Alabama) was watching his back. Bachus,
“who has received more money from JPMorgan Chase than any other donor except
one over his career … consistently interrupted even members of his own party when
they went too hard on Dimon.” In a newspaper interview in 2010 after he was
appointed committee chair, Bachus said:
"my view is that Washington and the regulators are there to serve the
banks."
Lying within Bachus’s 6th
district are parts of Jefferson County that include the suburbs of his native
Birmingham. In 1997 JPMorgan Chase sold Jefferson County a financing package
for a $300 million sewer project. The package included derivatives that went
bad, leaving the county with $3 billion in debt. This led the county in 2010 to
declare the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.
According to Bloomberg,
“In 2009, JPMorgan agreed to a $722 million settlement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission over payments its bankers allegedly made to people tied to [Jefferson]
county politicians to win [the financing contract].”
This sordid crime against his home
town did not deflect Rep. Bachus from his mission to “serve” Jamie Dimon’s
bank.
There’s nothing very special about
this “Mr. Dimon goes to Washington” story. It’s business as usual in the moral
swamp that is the government of the United States. And it’s the logical,
predictable outcome of a capitalist political system.
In a
capitalist political system, the primary role of a national government is to
protect and facilitate a national market in which firms operate with a minimum
of government intervention. Competition and economies of scale result in huge
corporations as dominant social institutions.
Money is power—it commands not only
goods and services in private markets, but also the services of those who
govern. Only those who control large corporations can provide the money
politicians need to campaign for national office in the world’s largest
economy.
So, in a capitalist political
system, the primary role of government is to nurture a private market that will
in turn subordinate government to the profits of the wealthy minority who control
large corporations.
Why would any society want to do
this? Ask our two political parties.
